Top 10 Inference Engineering Interview Questions for 2026
Ten inference engineering interview questions grouped by the physical constraint they test, each with an answer skeleton and the common trap.
GPU economics — latency, throughput, and the bill.
15 posts
Ten inference engineering interview questions grouped by the physical constraint they test, each with an answer skeleton and the common trap.
Tensor parallelism splits the math inside every layer; pipeline parallelism splits the layers themselves. The cost each pays, and when engines combine both.
Inference engineering makes a trained model fast and cheap in production under two physical constraints. Here is the map from constraint to lever to deep dive.
Reasoning models spend output tokens to think, and they pick how many. Why test-time compute breaks every serving optimization that assumed fixed output.
Mixture-of-experts models activate a fraction of parameters per token, but every expert still sits in GPU memory. Mechanism, real numbers, and the payoff math.
Should you train and serve your own AI model, or pay per token via an API? A GPU cost breakdown, a breakeven formula, and the exact ICP for each path.
Splitting prefill and decode onto separate GPU pools is now production, not research. It also turns the KV cache into a network problem — here's the tradeoff.
TTFT and TPOT measure two different things in LLM inference. Optimize the wrong one for your workload and you fix nothing. Here's the engineer's map.
Model weights are a fixed cost. The KV cache is the variable one, and its arithmetic decides how many users one GPU can serve at the same time.
LLM inference runs in two phases with opposite limits — prefill is compute-bound, decode is memory-bound. Where they collide is where your latency spikes.
Static batching leaves your GPU idle waiting for the slowest request. Continuous batching swaps requests in and out every step — up to 23x more throughput.
A small draft model guesses tokens, a big model verifies them — 2-3x faster LLM generation with mathematically identical output. Here's the catch.
vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, and SGLang all fix the same problem — GPU throughput. None of them fix a RAG system that answers fast from the wrong context.
Quantization shrinks model weights to cut LLM inference cost and memory 2-4x with little quality loss. Here is the tradeoff — and the one problem it can't fix.
Prompt/prefix caching is a bankable inference discount on stable prefixes. Semantic caching promises bigger savings by reusing answers — and quietly serves stale ones. Here's the cost math for both.
Inherent on Substack
Everything you need to know about AI, delivered to your inbox. Every week.